October 12, 2009

What could be improved about Real Time Strategy Games?

strategy games
unamigosencillo1686 asked:


If it 'type board game of SA Warhammer likes or a video game like Starcraft or Warcraft, what you feel you might be better about the gameplay? Pi? / Research different? Amounts of the unit? for each faction? Pi? factions to play as? Articles / objects / unique monsters? Anything you change about the current games you would see in a new game? Having a new regulator specifically designed for the game help or hinder? Digital game or real life? Thank you!

Content for WordPress

a

a a a

a »

October 15, 2009

The mon @ 5:20 pm

Originality. Since playing Age of Mythology which is quite a while ago no RTS has been good enough for me. They all offer the same options, in different ways, but still I think if there was an amazing concept, setting and a good story I would play it.

a
October 17, 2009

AleSmith @ 12:54 am

Less micro-managing which is something Dawn of War I feel did very well with the squad system. Kohan 2 was also like that but Kohan 2 kind of sucked unlike Dawn Of War. Nothing sucks more than having to control 90+ guys at a time though.

Yes, originality is always a bonus. I could really go for a steampunk RTS, I think that would be refreshing.

More focus on heros like with Warlords Battlecry 3 would be nice.

What could be improved with Warhammer fantasy/40k/table gaming for real? Less expensive, rebalanced for smaller fights a la Mordeheim, and basically just make the game quicker and more accesible to casual players. I got out of both Warhammer and Warhammer 40k just because it was so time consuming and expensive. My brother still plays though.

a
October 19, 2009

jcurrieii @ 12:57 pm

The graphics.

a

a

a